Thanks for the helpful article, helped me a lot understanding the practice with search engine optimization. Reply
It’s a mess , webmasters are starting to make ALL their external links nofollow in order to “leak” page rank….therefore the entire ranking factor of links whether do or nofollow is becoming more and more irrelevant. Google realise this and are now moving ranking factors more in the direction of WHO is linking to you , ignoring the nofollow tag if Google sees the link coming from a reputable website. eg : THE NEW YORK TIMES creates a nofollow link to your website? Do you think Google will ignore this? Think again. The new ranking Google factors of 2017 will be : Who is linking to you Nofollow tag is being phased out Social signals playing a more important role Reply
Interesting comments. External, good quality, relevant outbound links have been shown to be a ranking signal, whether they’re noFollow or not. If it’s relevant to the content and helpful to the person reading the content, I’d generally advocate linking out and leaving it as a follow link anyway. As for phasing out noFollow, I suspect that it’s more about “mention” attribution rather than ignoring a specific instruction not to follow a link. If not, Social Media platforms should brace themselves for billions of link-spam posts 🙁 Reply
Excellent way of explaining, and gօod ɑrticle to obtain data concerning my presentɑtion topic, which i am ǥoing to convey in collᥱge. Reply
Thanks for the helpful article, helped me a lot understanding the practice with search engine optimization. Reply
Thanks for the helpful article, helped me a lot understanding the practice with search engine optimization. Reply
The problem with testing it is that you need nofollows from great sites – Wikipedia is just one example ???? – and you can’t really get those without earning follow links as well. Still, my guess is that a link from a Wikipedia article will boost rankings. Reply